Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00160
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Williams II v. County of Onondaga
as 23-891
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Charles R. Williams
Defendant / Appellee:
County of Onondaga, County Attorney, City of Syracuse, City Attorney, Onondaga Co. D.A.'s Office, District Attorney's Office and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03214
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Williams II v. County of Onondaga et al
as 5:2022cv01367
Plaintiff:
Charles R. Williams II
Defendant:
County of Onondaga, City of Syracuse, Onondaga Co. D.A.'s Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DRUMWRIGHT et al v. COLE et al
as 1:2020cv00998
Plaintiff:
Rev. GREGORY B. DRUMWRIGHT, Edith Ann Jones, MELANIE MITCHELL and others
Defendant:
SHERIFF TERRY S. JOHNSON, Chief Mary Kristy Cole, JONATHAN FRANKS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03380
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Moore v. Berry
as 1:2020cv01136
Plaintiff:
Ronald Corey Moore
Defendant:
Marvin Darnell Berry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv02227
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
THOMPSON v. CONCEPCION-NIEVES et al
as 2:2012cv04404
Plaintiff:
JOE LAMONT THOMPSON
Defendant:
RAPHAEL CONCEPCION-NIEVES, COREY MOORE, RAYMOND LACEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Offenbacker et al v. Adams County Iowa et al
as 4:2011cv00171
Plaintiff:
Tyler Offenbacker and Wannita Olson
Defendant:
Adams County Iowa , Bill Lyddon , Robert Lillie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
