Cases 1 - 10 of 56
Walter Chruby v. Kirk Bearjar, et al
as 24-1200
Plaintiff:
WALTER A. CHRUBY
Defendant:
KIRK BEARJAR, ANNETTE KOWALEWSKI, JENNIFER SHROCK and others
John Preacher v. Correct Care Services Solutions, et al
as 23-2767
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN DALE PREACHER
Defendant / Appellee:
CORRECT CARE SERVICES SOLUTIONS, BRIAN HYDE, DR. KAUFNAN and others
John Preacher v. Correct Care Services/Solutions, et al
as 23-2000
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN DALE PREACHER
Defendant / Appellee:
CORRECT CARE SERVICES SOLUTIONS, BRIAN HYDE, KAUFNAN and others
John Preacher v. Correct Care Services/Solutions, et al
as 23-1981
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN DALE PREACHER
Defendant / Appellee:
CORRECT CARE SERVICES SOLUTIONS, BRIAN HYDE, KAUFNAN and others
BELL v. MARION COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2022cv00511
Plaintiff:
RICHARD EDWARD BELL
Defendant:
MARION COUNTY JAIL, JOHN LAYTON, GOWDY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gabriel Pittman v. Donald Trump, et al
as 21-1486
Defendant:
REBECCA RIEFER, P. NUNEZ, BARRY SMITH and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GABRIEL ISHAM PITTMAN
Hollon v. Central Intelligence Agency et al
as 5:2021cv00023
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Hollon
Defendant:
Ronald Reagan Presidential Library, Correct Care Services of Tennessee, Mrs. Ponsetti and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PITTMAN v. TRUMP et al
as 3:2020cv00138
Defendant:
P. NUNEZ, REBECCA RIEFER, JOHN WETZEL and others
Plaintiff:
GABRIEL ISHAM PITTMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whack v. Riverside Regional Jail et al
as 3:2020cv00173
Defendant:
Riverside Regional Jail and Correct Care Services
Plaintiff:
Larry Whack
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PREACHER v. CORRECT CARE SERVICES
as 2:2019cv01207
Plaintiff:
JOHN DALE PREACHER
Defendant:
CORRECT CARE SERVICES, DR. KROSS, COUNSELOR MICHAEL STELLA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
