Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 519
County of King, et al. v. Turner, et al.
as 25-3664
Plaintiff: COUNTY OF KING, COUNTY OF PIERCE, COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH and others
Defendant: SCOTT TURNER, Secretary, United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, SEAN DUFFY, Secretary, United States Department of Transportation and others
Nese v. Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2025cv04700
Petitioner: Alper Nese
Respondent: Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara
Interested Party: Michael P. Estremera and Minhee Chang
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Herships v. California Superior Court, et al.
as 25-3502
Plaintiff: HOWARD HERSHIPS
Defendant: CALIFORNIA SUPERIOR COURT, Sheriff LAURIE SMITH, Sheriff of Santa Clara County, Judge DREW C. TAKAICHI, Santa Clara County Superior Court and others
American Federation Of Government Employees, AFL-CIO, et al. v. Trump, et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 25-3293
Plaintiff: AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO, AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE, COUNTY & MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO, SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION and others
Defendant: DONALD J. TRUMP, OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET, RUSSELL VOUGHT and others
Trump, et al. v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California, San Francisco
as 25-3034
Petitioner: DONALD J. TRUMP, OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET, RUSSELL VOUGHT and others
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO
Real Party In Interest: AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO, AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE, COUNTY & MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO, SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION and others
American Federation Of Government Employees, AFL-CIO, et al. v. Trump, et al.
as 25-3030
Plaintiff: AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO, AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE, COUNTY & MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO, SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL-CIO and others
Defendant: DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the United States, OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET, RUSSELL VOUGHT, in his official capacity as Director of U.S. Office of Management and Budget and others
King County et al v. Turner et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2025cv00814
Plaintiff: King County, Pierce County, Snohomish County and others
Defendant: Scott Turner, United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, Sean Duffy and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
American Federation Of Government Employees, AFL-CIO et al v. Trump et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2025cv03698
Plaintiff: American Federation Of Government Employees, AFL-CIO, American Federation Of State County And Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO, Service Employees International Union, AFL-CIO and others
Defendant: President Donald J. Trump, United States Office of Management and Budget, Russell Vought and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Doe v. Smith et al
as 5:2025cv03490
Plaintiff: Jane Doe
Defendant: Jason A. Smith, Sgt. Eric Fenton, Stanford University Department of Public Safety and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
The People of the State of California, Acting by and through Santa Clara County Counsel Tony LoPresti, and the County of Santa Clara v. 3M Co. et al
as 5:2025cv03361
Defendant: EIDP, Inc., Carrier Fire & Security Americas LLC, RTYX Corporation and others
Plaintiff: The People of the State of California, Acting by and through Santa Clara County Counsel Tony LoPresti, and the County of Santa Clara
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?