Cases 1 - 10 of 61
Beebe v. Hanks, et al(Pinellas County)
as 8:2020cv02134
Petitioner:
Steven Beebe
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections, Attorney General, State of Florida and Craig Hanks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
COLE v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2019cv00365
Defendant:
H. CHRISTIAN DEBUYN, DAVID DONAHUE, J. WYNN and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN C. COLE, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Conner v. Hanks et al
as 8:2016cv02359
Petitioner:
Darion Conner
Respondent:
Craig Hanks, Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kelvin Jackson v. Craig Hanks, et al
as 16-14820
Petitioner - Appellant:
KELVIN JACKSON
Respondent - Appellee:
CRAIG HANKS, Superintendent Bay Correctional Facility and SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
JACKSON v. HANKS et al.
as 1:2016cv21402
Plaintiff:
KELVIN JACKSON
Defendant:
CRAIG HANKS and Julie L. Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Nixon et al v. Secretary, DOC et al
as 2:2015cv00574
Plaintiff:
Dwight Nixon, Steve Atkinson and Marvin McTeare
Defendant:
Secretary, DOC, Craig Hanks, P. Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanon v. Hanks et al
as 2:2014cv00618
Petitioner:
Darvenel Sanon
Respondent:
Craig Hanks and Secretary, DOC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Sanon v. Hanks
as 2:2014cv00613
Petitioner:
Darvenel Sanon
Respondent:
Craig Hanks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
WOODRING v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2014cv00165
Defendant:
DUANE ALSIP, ROBERT BUGHER, ANDREW COLE and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN N. WOODRING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PAYNE v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2013cv00635
Defendant:
JENIFER ADAMS, BILLY ALLAN, AMES and others
Plaintiff:
JESSIE L. PAYNE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
