Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Pharos Capital Partners, L.P. v. Deloitte & Touche, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-4381
Plaintiff - Appellant: PHAROS CAPITAL PARTNERS, L.P.
Defendant - Appellee: DELOITTE & TOUCHE, Deloitte & Touche LLP c/o Lawrence A Hilsheimer, Statutory Agent, CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CORPORATION, c/o Prentice Hall Corp System, Statutory Agent, PURCELL & SCOTT CO LPA, c/o Peggy A Scott, Statutory Agent and others
Pharos Capital Partners, L.P. v. Deloitte & Touche, et al
as 12-4381
Defendant / Appellee: HAROLD W. POTE, DELOITTE & TOUCHE, Deloitte & Touche LLP c/o Lawrence A Hilsheimer, Statutory Agent, CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CORPORATION, c/o Prentice Hall Corp System, Statutory Agent and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: PHAROS CAPITAL PARTNERS, L.P.
Arizona, State of, et al v. Credit Suisse First, et al
as 1:2012cv05804
Plaintiff: Arizona, State of , Pima County Community College District , San Luis, City of and others
Defendant: Credit Suisse First Boston Corporation , Bank One NA , Bank One Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452
Crown Cork & Seal Co, et al v. Credit Suisse First, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv05803
Plaintiff: Crown Cork & Seal Company Incorporated , Crown Cork & Seal Company Incorporated Master Retirement Trust , Indiana Public Employees Retirement Fund Board of Trustees and others
Defendant: Credit Suisse First Boston Corporation , Bank One NA , Bank One Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452
Unclaimed Property Recovery Service, Inc. et al v. Credit Suisse First Boston Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv03290
Plaintiff: Unclaimed Property Recovery Service, Inc. and Bernard Gelb
Defendant: Credit Suisse First Boston Corporation , Credit Suisse (USA), Inc. and Credit Suisse Securities (USA), LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TUCHOL v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 3:2011cv06105
Plaintiff: BRUCE TUCHOL
Defendant: METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and GROUP LONG TERM DISABILITY BENEFITS FOR EMPLOYEES OF CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
Callahan v. Credit Suisse (USA), Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv04599
Plaintiff: Patrick J. Callahan, Jr.
Defendant: Credit Suisse (USA), Inc. , Credit Suisse Group SA, Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wireless Facili. IPO, et al v. Wireless Facilities, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2001cv04779
Defendant: Wireless Facilities, Inc. , Credit Suisse First Boston Corporation, Hambrecht and Quist and others
Consolidated_plaintiff: Fuller & Thaler Asset Management
Consolidated_defendant: Thomas Weisel Partners LLC and CIBC World Markets
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
-AKT Murray v. Metropolitan Ins, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 9:2000cv02258
Respondent: Curtis H. Barnette, Paulette Beliunas, Robert H. Benmosche and others
Objector: Thomas Sterrett Bell, Christopher Mueller, John J. Pentz and others
Movant: Credit Suisse First Boston Corporation, Goldman, Sachs & Co., and New York State Insurance Department
Special Master: Richard J. Davis
Consol Plaintiff: Mary A. Devito, Michael A. Giannattasio, Martin Gold and others
Defendant: Metlife, Inc. and Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.
Plaintiff: Darren F. Murray
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Juenger v. King Pharmaceuticals, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2003cv00077
Plaintiff: Leslie Juenger and Josh Guttman
Defendant: King Pharmaceuticals, Inc. , John M Gregory , Jefferson J Gregory and others
Intervenor: Municipal Police Employees Retirement System of Louisiana , Jerry W Colton , Los Angeles County Employees Retirement Association and others
Intervenor_plaintiff: Mark C Meiering and Margaret G Meiering
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?