Cases
In re: Urethane AntiTrust Liti We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-3215
Plaintiff - Appellee: ALCO INDUSTRIES, INC., ARCTIC-TEMP, INC., BELTING INDUSTRIES COMPANY, INC. and others
Plaintiff-Intervenor - Appellee: QUABAUG CORPORATION and ELLIOTT COMPANY OF INDIANAPOLIS, INC.
Defendant - Appellant: THE DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY
Defendant: BASF AG, BASF CORPORATION, BAYER POLYMERS, L.L.C. and others
Movant: CROSSLINK TECHNOLOGY, INC., LAWRENCE STERN, CHEMTURA CORPORATION and others
: , , and others
Carpenter Co. et al v. BASF SE et al
as 2:2008cv02617
Plaintiff: Carpenter Co., Carpenter Canada Co., E.R. Carpenter, L.P. and others
Defendant: BASF SE, BASF Corporation, BASF Canada, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
CARPENTER CO. et al v. BASF SE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2008cv05169
Plaintiff: CARPENTER CO., CARPENTER CANADA CO., E.R. CARPENTER, L.P. and others
Defendant: BASF SE, BASF CORPORATION, BASF CANADA INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
In re: Urethane Antitrust Litigation
as 2:2004md01616
Plaintiff: Skypark Manufacturing, LLC, Urethane Antitrust Litigation, Alco Industries, Inc. and others
Defendant: Bayer MaterialScience, LLC, BASF AG, Bayer Corporation and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: Quabaug Corporation and Elliott Company of Indianapolis, Inc.
Claimant: Jack Baumstark and Class Action Refund
Not Classified By Court: Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, Johns Manville Corporation, Whirlpool Corporation and others
Petitioner: Crosslink Technology, Inc., Lawrence Stern, Chemtura Corporation and others
Interested Party: Wm. T. Burnett & Company, 3M Company, 3M France SAS and others
Material Witne: Michael D. Crowell, Charles Moeller, Buster Mann and others
Intervenor: Plaintiffs in the In re: Diisocyanates Antitrust Litigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1407 Multi-District Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?