Cases 1 - 10 of 11
(PC) Petillo v. CSP SAC New Folsom Prison
as 2:2021cv01471
Plaintiff:
Dennis Petillo and Dennis Petillo, Jr.
Defendant:
CSP SAC New Folsom Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Henderson v. California Department of Correction and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2020cv01576
Defendant:
CSP-Sac, California Department of Correction and Rehabilitation and CDCR-DVI
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Verdell Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) David Roberts v. CSP - SAC et al
as 2:2020cv01564
Defendant:
Jeff Lynch, Darling, CSP - SAC and others
Plaintiff:
David Nathaniel Roberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Roberts v. CSP - SAC et al
as 2:2020cv05578
Defendant:
Sgt. Darling, Lt. Adaza, Cpt. Konrad and others
Plaintiff:
David Roberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Hernandez v. California Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2020cv00739
Defendant:
Burkhart, Correctional Officers from AD-SEG, Childs and others
Plaintiff:
Pablo Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Lear v. Sahota et al
as 2:2018cv03099
Defendant:
R Vela, Richardson, Meskath Uddin and others
Plaintiff:
Roderick William Lear
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dwayne Eichler v. J. Tilton, et al
as 11-16374
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DWAYNE EICHLER
Defendant - Appellee:
J. TILTON, WOODFORD, HICKMAN and others
Cham Hoang v. James Walker
as 11-55574
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHAM HOANG
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES WALKER, Warden, CSP-Sac.
Williams v. State of California, Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2009cv02416
Plaintiff:
Lionel Williams
Defendant:
State of California, Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, M Street, S Palagummi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lawrence Birks v. Daniel Williamson, et al
as 08-56881
Petitioner - Appellant:
LAWRENCE BIRKS
Respondent - Appellee:
DANIEL E. WILLIAMSON, Attorney General and M. REYES, CSP-SAC Acting Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
