Cases 61 - 70 of 71
Hayes v. Caddo Parish Correctional Center et al
as 5:2019cv01620
Defendant:
Steve Prator and Caddo Parish Correctional Center
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Hayes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bell v. Caddo Parish Correctional Center et al
as 5:2019cv01612
Defendant:
Steve Prator and Caddo Parish Correctional Center
Plaintiff:
Darell Bell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jefferson v. Caddo Parish Correctional Center et al
as 5:2019cv01624
Defendant:
Steve Prator and Caddo Parish Correctional Center
Plaintiff:
Bobby Jefferson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Huffty v. Caddo Parish Correctional Center et al
as 5:2019cv01622
Defendant:
Steve Prator and Caddo Parish Correctional Center
Plaintiff:
Joshua Huffty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Caddo Parish Correctional Center et al
as 5:2019cv01621
Plaintiff:
Kylan Hill
Defendant:
Steve Prator and Caddo Parish Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Caddo Parish Correctional Center et al
as 5:2019cv01610
Plaintiff:
Brandon Jones
Defendant:
Steve Prator and Caddo Parish Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allums v. Caddo Parish Correctional Center et al
as 5:2019cv01609
Plaintiff:
LaGarian D Allums
Defendant:
Steve Prator and Caddo Parish Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. Caddo Parish Correctional Center et al
as 5:2019cv01608
Defendant:
Steve Prator and Caddo Parish Correctional Center
Plaintiff:
Angilo Coleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Caddo Parish Correctional Center et al
as 5:2019cv01614
Plaintiff:
Deandre Jones
Defendant:
Steve Prator and Caddo Parish Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Funcheon v. Caddo Parish et al
as 5:2012cv00762
Plaintiff:
William T Funcheon, Jr
Defendant:
Caddo Parish, Steve Prator, Farris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
