Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Peek et al v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv00230
Defendant:
Caliber Home Loans, Inc., LSF9 Master Participation Trust ("LSF9"), Nationstar Mortgage, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
John Kukulka and Heidi Peek
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Dickey v. Boston, MA, et al
as 17-1094
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES DICKEY
Defendant - Appellee:
BOSTON, MA, Through the Inspectional Service Department, EDWARD COBURN, individually and in his official capacity as lawyer for the City of Boston, JAMES JOSEPH COTTER, III, individually and in his official capacity as receiver for the Boston Housing Court and others
Defendant:
STEVEN AMARAL and KATIE AMARAL
Dickey v. Boston, MA, et al
as 16-1962
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES DICKEY
Defendant - Appellee:
BOSTON, MA, through the Inspectional Service Department, EDWARD COBURN, individually and in his official capacity as lawyer for the City of Boston, JAMES JOSEPH COTTER, III, individually and in his official capacity as receiver for the Boston Housing Court and others
In re: Dickey
as 16-1799
Petitioner:
JAMES DICKEY
Respondent:
BOSTON, MA, through the Inspectional Service Department, EDWARD COBURN, individually and in his official capacity as lawyer for the City of Boston, JAMES JOSEPH COTTER, III, individually and in his official capacity as receiver for the Boston Housing Court and others
Dickey v. Boston, MA, et al
as 16-1585
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES DICKEY
Defendant - Appellee:
BOSTON, MA, through the Inspectional Service Department, EDWARD COBURN, individually and in his official capacity as lawyer for the City of Boston, JAMES JOSEPH COTTER, III, individually and in his official capacity as receiver for the Boston Housing Court and others
Dickey v. City of Boston et al
as 1:2016cv10636
Plaintiff:
James Dickey
Defendant:
City of Boston, Edward Coburn, James Cotter III and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
