Cases 31 - 40 of 48
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-2738
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Caliber Home Loans, Inc. v. Zihlmann
as 1:2017cv04538
Plaintiff:
Caliber Home Loans, Inc.
Defendant:
Janet Zihlmann
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv01118
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Caliber Home Loans, Inc. v. Quinones et al
as 2:2017cv03888
Plaintiff:
Caliber Home Loans, Inc.
Defendant:
Clerk of the Suffolk County District Court, Clerk of the Suffolk County Traffic & Parking Violations Agency, Antonio G. Quinones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv04035
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv03948
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Battiste et al v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. et al
as 7:2016cv04065
Plaintiff:
Charles Battiste and Nadine Thompson
Defendant:
Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. and Caliber Home Loans, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1452
Battiste et al v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.
as 7:2016cv03983
Plaintiff:
Charles Battiste and Nadine Thompson
Defendant:
Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. and Caliber Home Loans, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Holmes v. Caliber Home Loans, Inc. et al
as 7:2016cv03344
Plaintiff:
William Holmes
Defendant:
Caliber Home Loans, Inc. , Edward C. Klein, Cohn & Roth and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00301
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
