Cases 11 - 20 of 284
Seme v. Caliber Home Loans, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01521
Plaintiff:
Eric Seme
Defendant:
Caliber Home Loans, Inc. and Newrez LLC doing business as Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing
Counter Defendant:
Unknown Spouse, if any, of Eric Seme
Counter Claimant:
Newrez LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-10988
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cruz et al. v. Caliber Home Loans, Inc. et al.
as 4:2023cv00513
Plaintiff:
Orlando Cruz, II and Melanie Cruz
Defendant:
Caliber Home Loans, Inc. and NewRez, LLC doing business as Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00660
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00091
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Katz v. Caliber Home Loans, Inc.
as 3:2023cv00145
Plaintiff:
Samuel Katz
Defendant:
Caliber Home Loans Inc
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00057
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Rogers Morgan v. Caliber Home Loans, Inc.
as 22-320
Petitioner:
ROGERS MORGAN
Respondent:
CALIBER HOME LOANS, INC.
Stafford v. Caliber Home Loans, Inc.
as 2:2022cv03777
Plaintiff:
Sylvia Stafford
Defendant:
Caliber Home Loans, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Fedorova v. Foley et al
as 1:2022cv00991
Defendant:
Covius Document Services, LLC, Nationwide Title Clearing, LLC, William P. Foley, II and others
Plaintiff:
Elena Fedorova
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
