Labor Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Dejon White v. State of California, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-17143
Plaintiff - Appellant: DEJON D. WHITE
Defendant - Appellee: STATE OF CALIFORNIA, (California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation), BRENT L. WARREN, L.M. PENNISI, Jr. and others
Bay Area Painters and Tapers Pension Trust Fund and its Joint Board of Trustees et al v. State of California, Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013cv01172
Plaintiff: Bay Area Painters and Tapers Pension Trust Fund and its Joint Board of Trustees , Les Proteau , Charles Del Monte and others
Defendant: State of California, Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Silveira et al v. State of California et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv00084
Plaintiff: Carl Silveira and Georgette Pickett
Defendant: State of California, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation , California Department of Personnel Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Silveira et al v. State of California et al
as 1:2013at00024
Plaintiff: Carl Silveira and Georgette Pickett
Defendant: State of California, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, California Department of Personnel Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Charles Hughes et al v. State of California et al
as 2:2012cv10962
Defendant: California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, California Department of Mental Health, California Department of Personnel Administration and others
Plaintiff: Charles Hughes and Georgette Pickett
Seifullah v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 3:2012cv01451
Plaintiff: Aaliyah Seifullah
Defendant: California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and Registry of Physician Specialists
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Richard Newton, et al v. Arnold Schwarzenegger, et al
as 11-16576
Plaintiff - Appellant: RICHARD T. NEWTON, FRANK M. MCNEAL and SEAN A. BEATON
Defendant - Appellee: ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of California, DEBBIE ENDSLEY, in her official capacity as the Director of the California Department of Personnel Administration, JOHN CHIANG, in his official capacity as Controller of the State of California and others
Toochinda v. Division of Correctional Health Care Services, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2008cv04448
Respondent: J. Clark Kelso , Division of Correctional Health Care Services, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and Governing Body of the Division of Correctional Services, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Petitioner: Charn Toochinda, M.D.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Toochinda v. Division of Correctional Health Care Services, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, et al
as 5:2008cv04448
Receiver: J. Clark Kelso
Petitioner: Charn Toochinda, M.D., Charn Toochinda, M.D. and Charn Toochinda, M.D.
Respondent: Division of Correctional Health Care Services, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and Governing Body of the Division of Correctional Services, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Labor None
Toochinda v. Division of Correctional Health Care Services, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, et al
as 2:2008at00479
Receiver: J. Clark Kelso
Petitioner: Charn Toochinda, M.D.
Respondent: Division of Correctional Health Care Services, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and Governing Body of the Division of Correctional Services, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Labor None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?