Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Bell v. New York State Department of C
as 20-3525
Defendant / Appellee:
Tom Patnode, individually, in his official capacity and as a coconspirator; RCF Corrections Sergeant and NYSCOPBA union member, Jim Bleu, individually, in his official capacity and as a coconspirator; RCF Corrections Officer and local NYSCOPBA Union President (resigned), Terry Pike, individually, in his official capacity and as a coconspirator; RCF Corrections Officer and local NYSCOPBA Union President (resigned) and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Randy R. Bell
Madera v. Rabsatt
as 17-3979
Petitioner - Appellee:
Fernando Madera
Respondent - Appellant:
Calvin O. Rabsatt, Superintendent of Riverview Correctional Facility
Smith v. Ashley et al
as 9:2015cv00496
Plaintiff:
Jason Smith
Defendant:
S. Ashley, M. Hamilton, A. Rufa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Monroe v. Rabsatt
as 6:2014cv06118
Petitioner:
Christopher Monroe
Respondent:
Calvin O. Rabsatt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Monroe v. Rabsatt
as 9:2014cv00237
Petitioner:
Christopher Monroe
Respondent:
Calvin O. Rabsatt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Liao v. Rabsatt
as 9:2014cv00048
Plaintiff:
Shihsiang Liao
Defendant:
Calvin O. Rabsatt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Liao v. Cuomo et al
as 9:2014cv00031
Petitioner:
Shih-Siang Shawn Liao
Respondent:
Andrew M. Cuomo and Calvin O. Rabsatt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Madera v. Rabsatt
as 1:2013cv08058
Petitioner:
Fernando Madera
Respondent:
Calvin O. Rabsatt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Morse v. Annucci et al
as 9:2013cv01354
Plaintiff:
Jay H. Morse
Defendant:
Anthony J. Annucci, P. Chappius, Jr., Mallorney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Madera v. Rabsatt
as 9:2013cv01343
Petitioner:
Fernando Madera
Respondent:
Calvin O. Rabsatt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
