Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Turner v. Camping, World Inc. et al
as 4:2022cv00276
Plaintiff:
Wendy Turner
Defendant:
Camping World, Inc. and John Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Trophia et al v. Camping World, Inc.
as 8:2022cv00128
Plaintiff:
Samuel J. Trophia and Shane T. Hall
Defendant:
Camping World, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00404
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00851
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Starke v. Camping World Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00090
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Starke
Defendant:
Camping World Inc. and Electric Guard Dog, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Malin et al v. Heartland Recreational Vehicles, LLC et al (JOINT ASSIGN)
as 1:2017cv00230
Plaintiff:
Leroy W. Malin and Angela J. Malin
Defendant:
Heartland Recreational Vehicles, LLC , Thor Industries, Inc. , Freedom Roads Operating Company, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Venson et al v. Camping World, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00042
Plaintiff:
Mark Venson and Helen Venson
Defendant:
Camping World, Inc. and Winnebago Industires
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Vaughan v. Lazy Days' RV Center Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00582
Plaintiff:
Charles C. Vaughan
Defendant:
Lazy Days' RV Center Inc. , Crossroads RV, Inc. and Camping World, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Knight et al v. Dandy RV Superstore Inc et al
as 2:2016cv00229
Plaintiff:
Terry Knight and Pamela Knight
Defendant:
Dandy RV Superstore Inc , Forest River Inc and Camping World Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Hassan v. Camping World Inc.
as 1:2015cv04498
Plaintiff:
Ibrahim Hassan
Defendant:
Camping World Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
