Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Davis v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
Candy Davis
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Bradley v. L.C.A.D.C. et al
as 1:2022cv00136
Plaintiff:
Dr. Reginald D. Bradley
Defendant:
L.C.A.D.C., Mr. Sheriff Eddie Hawkins, C.O. Mr. Lennox Bartlet and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv04583
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Anderson v. Davis et al
as 3:2020cv00074
Defendant:
Candy Davis, David Bowling, Marty Boyd and others
Plaintiff:
Clarence Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ryan v. Arledge et al
as 1:2016cv00158
Plaintiff:
Brent Everrett Ryan
Defendant:
Mike Arledge, Mark Miley, Rick Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
M. C. v. Kim Aydlette
as 13-2182
Plaintiff - Appellee:
M. C., a minor by and through his parents Pamela Crawford and John Mark Crawford, parental natural guardian Pamela Crawford, parental natural guardian John Mark Crawford
Defendant - Appellee:
KIM AYDLETTE, MEREDITH WILLIAMS, CANDICE DAVIS, a/k/a Candi Davis and others
Defendant:
DR. JAMES AMRHEIN, DR. IAN AARONSON, DR. YAW APPIAGYEI-DANKAH and others
M. C. v. Dr. Ian Aaronson
as 13-2183
Plaintiff - Appellee:
M. C., a minor by and through his parents Pamela Crawford and John Mark Crawford, parental natural guardian Pamela Crawford, parental natural guardian John Mark Crawford
Defendant - Appellant:
DR. IAN AARONSON and DR. YAW APPIAGYEI-DANKAH
Defendant:
DR. JAMES AMRHEIN, KIM AYDLETTE, MEREDITH WILLIAMS and others
M. C. v. Dr. James Amrhein
as 13-2178
Plaintiff - Appellee:
M. C., a minor by and through his parents Pamela Crawford and John Mark Crawford, parental natural guardian Pamela Crawford, parental natural guardian John Mark Crawford
Defendant - Appellant:
DR. JAMES AMRHEIN
Defendant:
DR. IAN AARONSON, DR. YAW APPIAGYEI-DANKAH, KIM AYDLETTE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
