Cases 1 - 10 of 206
Nyree Hinton v. Capital One Auto Finance et al
as 2:2024cv03039
Plaintiff:
Nyree Hinton
Defendant:
Capital One Auto Finance, a Division of Capital One, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
In Re Subpoena to [24]7.AI, Inc.
as 5:2024mc80080
Plaintiff:
Parus Holdings, Inc.
Defendant:
FMR LLC and Capital One, N.A.
Respondent:
[24]7.AI, INC.,
Duncan v. Capital One, N.A.
as 3:2024cv00474
Plaintiff:
Deborah Duncan
Defendant:
Capital One, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Allen v. Capital One, N.A.
as 3:2024cv00472
Plaintiff:
Pilar Allen
Defendant:
Capital One, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Larry Singer v. Capital One, National Association et al
as 8:2024cv00399
Plaintiff:
Larry Singer
Defendant:
Capital One, N.A. and Compass Group USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00375
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Jay Sim v. Capital One Financial Corporation et al
as 2:2024cv01222
Plaintiff:
Jay Sim
Defendant:
Capital One Financial Corporation and Capital One, N.A.
Petitioner:
Scott Savett, Sheryl Barnes, Samuel Hans and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Stephanie Mayes v. Capital One, N.A.
as 5:2024cv00133
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Mayes
Defendant:
Capital One, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00497
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
