Cases 21 - 30 of 486
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00400
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640 Truth in Lending
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv22266
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv04070
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01890
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
BOOKER v. LIGHTFOOT et al
as 1:2023cv21274
Petitioner:
HARVEY WATKINS BOOKER, III
Respondent:
ARBITRATOR L. LIGHTFOOT, PREMIER KIA OF KENNER and CAPITAL ONE AUTO FINANCE
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010 Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award
Lee v. Capital One Auto Financing et al
as 4:2023cv03973
Plaintiff:
Ryon Dior Lee
Defendant:
Capital One Auto Financing, Dereyk Fields, Kenneth Massey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Edwards v. Capital One Financial Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv00648
Plaintiff:
Dashawn Anthony Edwards
Defendant:
Capital One Financial Corporation and Capital One Auto Finance
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv07538
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Washington v. Capital One Auto Finance
as 1:2023cv04607
Plaintiff:
Kenrick Rashad Washington
Defendant:
Capital One Auto Finance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv14642
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
