Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Byrd v. Cisco et al
as 8:2023cv01717
Plaintiff:
Ivey Nicole Byrd
Defendant:
Lt Cisco, Sgt Capps, Judge Roper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Daniels v. Wilcher et al
as 4:2021cv00226
Plaintiff:
Dominique Daniels
Defendant:
Sheriff John Wilcher, Captain Blanton, Captain Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sowell v. Richardson
as 21-20136
Defendant / Appellee:
Michelle Northcutt, Captain Hill, H. M. Pederson and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Kenneth Sowell
Quarterman v. Hill et al
as 4:2021cv00063
Plaintiff:
Garnell Dewitt Quarterman
Defendant:
Sgt. Over The Unit, Officer, Captain Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bell et al v. Welcher et al
as 4:2020cv00302
Defendant:
Captain Blanton, Major Boyles, Captain B. Ervin and others
Plaintiff:
Taurus Myers, Dominique Daniels, Vodie Nathaniel Bell, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fraley v. Dillard et al
as 5:2020ct03223
Plaintiff:
Shawn Germaine Fraley
Defendant:
Captain Hill Dillard and Sergeant Dance
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duncan v. Wilcher et al
as 4:2019cv00014
Defendant:
Correct Heath Inc., Sheriff John T. Wilcher, Ofc. J. Gibson and others
Plaintiff:
Leontae V. Duncan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BENGE v. RANDOLPH COUNTY et al
as 1:2018cv00648
Defendant:
B. A. MCPHERSON, P. LOVE, CAPTAIN HILL and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JOSEPH BENGE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas Reese v. Ohio Dept of Rehabilitation, et al
as 17-3380
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS REESE
Defendant - Appellee:
OHIO DEPARTMENT OF REHABILITATION AND CORRECTIONS, TROOPER COSTERELLA, [UNKNOWN] TROOPER and others
Reese v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction et al
as 4:2016cv02660
Plaintiff:
Thomas Reese
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction, Trooper Costerella, Unknown Trooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
