Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Stoudemire v. Thomas et al
as 2:2024cv01163
Plaintiff:
Hazel Stoudemire, SR
Defendant:
Sergeant Thomas, Lieutenant Priester, Captain Livingston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stoudemire v. Thomas et al
as 2:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
Hazel Stoudemire, SR
Defendant:
Sgt. Thomas, Lieutant Priester, Captain Livingston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Randle Jackson v. Anthony Hall
as 23-2095
Plaintiff / Appellee:
RANDLE JACKSON, individually and as the Personal Representative for the Estate of Dashawn Simmons
Defendant / Appellant:
ANTHONY HOWARD HALL, CAPTAIN REESE and CAPTAIN LIVINGSTON
Randle Jackson v. Anthony Hall
as 23-2012
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RANDLE JACKSON, individually and as the Personal Representative for the Estate of Dashawn Simmons
Defendant / Appellee:
ANTHONY HOWARD HALL, CAPTAIN REESE and CAPTAIN LIVINGSTON
Randle Jackson v. Captain Livingston
as 22-7335
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RANDLE JACKSON, individually and as the Personal Representative for the Estate of Dashaun Simmons
Defendant / Appellee:
CAPTAIN LIVINGSTON, ANTHONY HOWARD HALL and CAPTAIN REESE
Defendant:
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Jackson v. South Carolina Department of Corrections, The et al
as 1:2022cv01656
Plaintiff:
Randle Jackson
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections, The, Captain Livingston, Anthony Howard Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Hazel Stoudemire, Jr. v. Sergeant Thomas
as 22-6280
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HAZEL STOUDEMIRE, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
SGT. THOMAS, Prison Guard, LIEUTENANT PRIESTER and CAPTAIN LIVINGSTON
Simmons v. Hall et al
as 1:2020cv03036
Defendant:
Captain Livingstone, Anthony Howard Hall and Captain Reese
Plaintiff:
Dashawn Simmons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
