Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Bush v. Cardtronics Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv01373
Plaintiff:
William David Bush
Defendant:
Cardtronics Inc., Fiserv Inc. and BlackRock Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bush v. Cardtronics Inc. et al
as 3:2019mc80062
Plaintiff:
William David Bush
Defendant:
Cardtronics Inc., Fiserv Inc. and BlackRock Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Schertzer v. Bank of America, N.A.
as 3:2019cv00264
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A., TD Bank, FCTI, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Kristen Schertzer, Harley Seegert, Meagan Hicks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bc
Bush v. Cardtronics Inc et al
as 3:2016cv05862
Plaintiff:
William David Bush
Defendant:
Cardtronics Inc, Giovanni A. Locandro, Michael H. Clinard and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Encoditech LLC v. Cardtronics, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv01086
Plaintiff:
Encoditech LLC
Defendant:
Cardtronics, Inc. and Cardtronics USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Greene Holcomb & Fisher LLC v. Cardtronnics USA, Inc. et al
as 0:2014cv05038
Plaintiff:
Greene Holcomb & Fisher LLC
Defendant:
Cardtronics USA, Inc. , Cardtronics, Inc. and Phillip A. Rock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Telecomm Innovations LLC v. Cardtronics Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv01252
Plaintiff:
Telecomm Innovations LLC
Defendant:
Cardtronics Inc. and ATM National Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv03006
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
DeLiberty v. Cardtronics, Inc.
as 3:2012cv02699
Defendant:
Cardtronics, Inc
Plaintiff:
Stephanie De Liberty
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Telecomm Innovations LLC v. Cardtronics Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv01268
Plaintiff:
Telecomm Innovations LLC
Defendant:
Cardtronics Inc. and ATM National Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
