Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Manhattan Telecommunications Corporation v. Carhartt, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv08332
Plaintiff:
Manhattan Telecommunications Corporation and Mettel
Defendant:
Carhartt, Inc. and Linda Hubbard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 nr Diversity: Notice of Removal
Gregory Moore, Jr. v. Carhartt, Inc.
as 3:2023cv00145
Plaintiff:
Gregory Moore, Jr.
Defendant:
Carhartt, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2511 Wiretapping - Injunctive Relief or Civil Fine
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01646
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities Act - Enforcement
Carhartt, Inc. v. COSTA DEL MAR, INC.
as 3:2021cv11844
Plaintiff:
Carhartt, Inc.
Defendant:
COSTA DEL MAR, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Carhartt, Inc. v. Innovative Textiles, Inc., et al
as 20-1826
Defendant / Appellee:
INNOVATIVE TEXTILES, LLC and INNOVATIVE TEXTILES, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARHARTT, INC.
Defendant:
GENTRY MILLS, INC.
Carhartt, Inc. v. Creestock.com et al
as 2:2020cv12225
Defendant:
Creestock.com, PiperMall.com, and Tee Do it Better
Plaintiff:
Carhartt, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121
CARHARTT, INC. v. QUALITY SALES & LEASING, INC., et al
as 1:2019cv00553
Defendant:
QUALITY SALES & LEASING, INC. and MARION D. MAY
Plaintiff:
CARHARTT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
PEERLESS INSURANCE COMPANY et al v. INNOVATIVE TEXTILES, INC. et al
as 1:2019cv00362
Defendant:
CARHARTT, INC. and INNOVATIVE TEXTILES, INC.
Plaintiff:
OHIO SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY and PEERLESS INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nevitt v. Carhartt Inc.
as 4:2018cv00126
Defendant:
Carhartt, Inc.
Plaintiff:
April Nevitt and Justin Nevitt
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Sadler v. Carhartt, Inc.
as 2:2018cv12164
Plaintiff:
Franka Sadler
Defendant:
Carhartt, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
