Cases 1 - 10 of 52
Decker Advertising Inc. v. Delaware County, New York et al
as 3:2023cv01531
Plaintiff:
Decker Advertising Inc.
Defendant:
Delaware County, New York, Tina Mole, Arthur Merrill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carl Edward Davis v. United States of America
as 8:2022cv01137
Petitioner:
Carl Edward Davis
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Yankey v. Williams et al
as 6:2022cv01049
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Desmond Yankey, Jr.
Defendant:
Laurie B. Williams, Carl B. Davis and Katrina Dobbs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Davis et al v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
as 1:2021cv00303
Plaintiff:
Carl William Davis and Shannon Waller Davis
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, Niall Stewart and Alan Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv58041
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CARL ELDON DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv88049
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CARL L DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carl Davis v. David Shinn
as 20-15790
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director, Director, Dept of Correction, State of Arizona
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARL DWIGHT DAVIS
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv56431
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CARL THOMAS DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis v. USA-2255
as 1:2020cv00913
Respondent:
USA-2255
Petitioner:
Carl James Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Davis #066882 v. Shinn
as 2:2020cv00163
Defendant:
David Shinn
Plaintiff:
Carl Dwight Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
