Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Baisi v. Bleavins et al
as 3:2024cv00162
Plaintiff:
Vincent Gregory Baisi
Defendant:
Cpl. John Bleavins, Lt. James Irwin, Western Regional Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andred Davis, Jr. v. Paul Diamond
as 23-7284
Plaintiff:
ANDRED CLINTON DAVIS, JR.
Defendant:
PAUL DIAMOND, CHRISTOPHER FLEMING, BETSY JIVIDEN and others
Jones v. West Virginia Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 3:2022cv00366
Plaintiff:
Michael P. Jones
Defendant:
West Virginia Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Western Regional Jail, M. Bryant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jeffers v. Aldridge et al
as 3:2022cv00268
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Matthew Jeffers
Defendant:
Administrator Carl Aldridge, C.O. Lloyd Irwin, C.O. Pringle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Jividen et al
as 3:2022cv00150
Plaintiff:
Andred Clinton Davis, Jr.
Defendant:
Betsy Gevidin, Carl Aldridge, Paul Diamond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Aldridge et al
as 3:2022cv00141
Plaintiff:
Brandon Edward Moore
Defendant:
Superintendent, Sgt. Smith, Ofc. Albright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aldridge v. Kroger Texas, LP
as 3:2021cv00348
Plaintiff:
Carl Aldridge
Defendant:
The Kroger Co. and Kroger Texas, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Holbrook v. Aldridge
as 3:2021cv00220
Petitioner:
Shane Stephen Holbrook
Respondent:
Carl Aldridge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Holbrook v. Aldridge et al
as 3:2021cv00170
Defendant:
Major Flemming, Albright, Endicott and others
Plaintiff:
Shane Holbrook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blake v. Hood et al
as 3:2021cv00167
Defendant:
Jeffery Hood, Carl Aldridge, Lora A. Dyer and others
Plaintiff:
Bobby L. Blake
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
