Cases 21 - 30 of 30
David Meyers v. US Marshal's Office
as 19-7845
Respondent / Appellee:
THOMAS T. CULLEN, U.S. Attorney for the Western District of Virginia, A. VANHUSS, CARL MANIS, Warden and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
LeAnthony Winston v. Harold Clarke
as 19-7174
Defendant / Appellee:
RENALD MEYERS, Superintendent of Hampton Roads Regional Jail, HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of Virginia D.O.C. and CARL MANIS, Warden of Wallens Ridge
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LEANTHONY WINSTON
David Meyers v. C. Flemmings
as 19-6904
Defendant / Appellee:
I. O. HARRIS, S. STALLARD, Food Service Dietician, COUNSELOR CAUGHRON, Counselor and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
David Meyers v. Gail Jones
as 19-6906
Defendant / Appellee:
MONAHAN, QMPH-WRSP, DOCTOR UNKNOWN, WRSP, PROPERTY OFFICER PHILLIPS, WRSP and others
Defendant:
T. B. DYE and WALLENS RIDGE STATE PRISON
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
David Meyers v. Carl Manis
as 19-6908
Defendant / Appellee:
W. SWINEY, CARL MANIS, COUNSELOR CAUGHRON and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Alkeim Howard v. Carl Manis
as 19-6831
Respondent / Appellee:
CARL MANIS
Petitioner / Appellant:
ALKEIM D. HOWARD
David Meyers v. Carl Manis
as 19-6489
Defendant / Appellee:
W. SWINEY, CARL MANIS, COUNSELOR CAUGHRON and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Takaeus Graham v. T. Jarrell
as 19-6624
Defendant / Appellee:
A. DAVID ROBINSON, MAJOR T. JARRELL, Correctional Officer, LIEUTENANT D. ANDERSON, Correctional Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TAKAEUS MAKEON GRAHAM
David Meyers v. Carl Manis
as 19-6258
Defendant / Appellee:
W. SWINEY, CARL MANIS, COUNSELOR CAUGHRON and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
David Meyers v. Gail Jones
as 19-6184
Defendant / Appellee:
CARL MANIS, WALLENS RIDGE STATE PRISON, COUNSELOR YOUNG, WRSP and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
