Cases 51 - 60 of 129
Allen v. Fields et al
as 7:2021cv00244
Defendant:
T. Lowe, Carl Manis, A.T. Collins and others
Plaintiff:
Karsten O. Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen v. Sater et al
as 7:2021cv00230
Defendant:
Officer R. Daniels, T. Lowe, Officer Hess and others
Plaintiff:
Karsten O. Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen v. Fields et al
as 7:2021cv00207
Defendant:
T. Lowe, Carl Manis, Rachel Harmon and others
Plaintiff:
Karsten Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniel Taylor v. Carl Manis
as 21-6418
Defendant / Appellee:
HAROLD CLARKE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, CARL MANIS, Warden of Wallens Ridge State Prison, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER CARBER, Floor Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL TAYLOR
Riddick v. Collins et al
as 7:2020cv00742
Defendant:
S. Fletcher, Lavonda Deel, C/O A. Gardner and others
Plaintiff:
Steve Riddick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meyers v. Chief Executive Officer of JPay Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv24928
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, State of Florida Corporation Commission, Warden Jeffrey Kiser and others
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Riddick v. Moore et al
as 7:2020cv00560
Plaintiff:
Steve Riddick and Steven Riddick
Defendant:
Warden Jeffery Kiser, Carl Manis, C/O K. Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Meyers v. Carl Manis
as 20-7262
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICER DANIELS, J. ELY, A. W. COMBS and others
Defendant:
JAMES JONES, PAMELA MEADE SARGENT, ROBERT STEWART BALLOU and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
David Meyers v. Carl Manis
as 20-7238
Defendant / Appellee:
OFC. PERRIGAN, J. ELY, Unit Manager, J. GILLIAM and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
David Meyers v. Carl Manis
as 20-7246
Defendant / Appellee:
I. O. RIVERO, I. O. HARRIS, J. ELY and others
Defendant:
JULIA C. DUDLEY, PAMELA MEADE SARGENT, ROBERT STEWART BALLOU and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
