Cases 61 - 70 of 129
David Meyers v. Carl Manis
as 20-7262
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICER DANIELS, J. ELY, A. W. COMBS and others
Defendant:
JAMES JONES, PAMELA MEADE SARGENT, ROBERT STEWART BALLOU and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
David Meyers v. Carl Manis
as 20-7238
Defendant / Appellee:
OFC. PERRIGAN, J. ELY, Unit Manager, J. GILLIAM and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Taylor v. Manis
as 7:2020cv00451
Plaintiff:
Daniel Taylor
Defendant:
Carl Manis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meyers v. Director of JPay Corporation et al
as 6:2020cv00947
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, Carl Manis, Certified Public Accountant for JPay Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Meyers v. T. Hall
as 20-6627
Defendant / Appellee:
CARL MANIS, MARCUS ELAM, ELY, Unit Manager and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
David Meyers v. Carl Manis
as 20-6643
Defendant / Appellee:
W. SWINEY, J. ELY, D. BAKER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
David Meyers v. Carl Manis
as 20-6625
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICER DANIELS, J. ELY, A. W. COMBS and others
Defendant:
JAMES JONES, PAMELA MEADE SARGENT, ROBERT STEWART BALLOU and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
David Meyers v. Carl Manis
as 20-6638
Defendant / Appellee:
OFC. PERRIGAN, J. ELY, Unit Manager, J. GILLIAM and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Thorpe et al v. Virginia Department Of Corrections et al
as 3:2019cv00332
Defendant:
Denise Malone, A. David Robinson, Tori Raiford and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Cottrell, Brian Cavitt, Peter Mukuria and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Violation of Due Process and Equal Protection
Doane v. Clarke et al
as 7:2020cv00250
Defendant:
Mr. Harold Clarke, J. Yonce, Sgt. Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
DeAnthony Doane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
