Cases 1 - 10 of 976
DANIELS v. HUT AMERICAN GROUP, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00311
Plaintiff:
CARLA DANIELS
Defendant:
HUT AMERICAN GROUP, LLC, HUT CAROLINAS, LLC and NPC INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Choke Canyon Motel, Inc. v. City of Port Aransas et al
as 2:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
Choke Canyon Motel, Inc.
Defendant:
City of Port Aransas, David Parsons, Adams . Rick and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00312
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-7038
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-7039
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00733
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Hardaway et al v. Grandy II et al
as 2:2024cv10528
Plaintiff:
Carla Hardaway and Nyrand Hardaway
Defendant:
Colonel James F. Grandy II, Trooper John Christiansen and Trooper Unknown Michigan State Police
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Bouvier v. Bouvier Kennedy Schlossberg et al
as 1:2024cv01374
Plaintiff:
Carla Bouvier
Defendant:
Caroline Lee Bouvier Kennedy Schlossberg and Hyperion Books
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
SHAO v. HAYDEN
as 1:2024cv00360
Plaintiff:
DONGFANG SHAO
Defendant:
CARLA HAYDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Alexis Carberry v. Darlington County School District
as 24-1119
Plaintiff:
ALEXIS CARBERRY BENSON
Defendant:
DARLINGTON COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, TIM NEWMAN, indv., CARLA JEFFERSON, indv. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.