Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Bravo-Lemos v. Rokosky et al
as 1:2023cv00076
Petitioner: Carlos Bravo-Lemos
Respondent: Warden Rokosky and Acting Warden Lefever
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
US v. Bravo-Lemos
as 20-1031
Defendant / Appellant: CARLOS BRAVO-LEMOS
Appellee: UNITED STATES
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv01789
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12102
Perez et al v. Vicart, LLC et al
as 8:2018cv02105
Plaintiff: Antonio Jesus Perez , Heriberto Longines Gonzalez and Luis Roberto Miranda
Defendant: Vicart, LLC , Vicart 2, LLC and Carlos Bravo
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
PEREZ et al v. VICART, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv02105
Plaintiff: ANTONIO JESUS PEREZ , HERIBERTO LONGINES GONZALEZ and LUIS ROBERTO MIRANDA
Defendant: VICART, LLC, VICART 2, LLC and CARLOS BRAVO
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Perez et al v. Vicart, LLC et al
as 8:2018cv02105
Defendant: Carlos Bravo, Vicart 2, LLC and Vicart, LLC
Plaintiff: Luis Roberto Miranda, Antonio Jesus Perez and Heriberto Longines Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Acosta v. 1050 E Mossman LLC et al
as 4:2018cv00059
Plaintiff: Carlos Bravo Acosta
Defendant: 1050 E Mossman LLC, Maria Vasquez, Emery Mobile Home Park and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Bravo v. USA
as 1:2017cv12063
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Carlos Bravo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Berlin v. City and County of San Francisco et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv06046
Plaintiff: Monica Berlin
Defendant: LinkedIn, ProTech Security, Tracy Burris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bravo-Avendano v. Giles W. Dalby Correctional Facility et al
as 5:2013cv00071
Plaintiff: Carlos Bravo-Avendano
Defendant: Giles W. Dalby Correctional Facility and Dalby Correctional Officers 1-100
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?