Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Lomax v. Wal-Mart Stores East
as 23-1734
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTIE TWYNETTE LOMAX, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, MARIE ELENA CASTILLO, JESSY FAIR and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv10345
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
LEVIEN et al v. HIBU PLC et al
as 2:2019cv03239
Defendant:
TOBY RUFUS COPPEL, ROBERT CHARLES MICHAEL WIGLEY, ESTATE OF JOHN MICHAEL POCOCK and others
Plaintiff:
THOMAS LEVIEN and JAMES WESTHEAD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Yepes et al v. El Tio Pio West Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv02038
Plaintiff:
Jorge Yepes and Julio Cesar Esquivel Rivera
Defendant:
El Tio Pio West Inc., El Tio Pio Corp., Pio Bagel Eight Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
ESPINOSA et al v. CAREFUL SHIRTS, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv01429
Plaintiff:
APOLONIO ESPINOSA , MINERVA OLMEDO and CARLOS ESPINOSA URAGA
Defendant:
CAREFUL SHIRTS, INC. , C & K LAUNDRY SYSTEMS, INC. , YONG W. KANG and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Andres Adame, et al. v. Comtrak Logistics, Inc. et al.
as 5:2015cv02232
Plaintiff:
Andres Adame, Edgar Alejo, Edwin Alvarado and others
Defendant:
Dan Burke, Comtrak Logistics, Inc., Does and others
McCusker v. HIBU PLC et al
as 2:2015cv02659
Defendant:
Tony Bates, Elizabeth G. Chambers, John Coghlan and others
Plaintiff:
James McCusker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal Libel,Assault,Slander
McCusker v. HIBU PLC et al
as 1:2015cv02657
Defendant:
Tony Bates, Elizabeth G. Chambers, John Coghlan and others
Plaintiff:
James McCusker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal Libel,Assault,Slander
McCUSKER v. HIBU PLC et al
as 2:2014cv05670
Plaintiff:
JAMES McCUSKER
Defendant:
HIBU PLC , HIBU INC. , MIKE POCOCK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
CAIRNS v. HIBU PLC et al
as 2:2014cv05671
Defendant:
ELIZABETH G. CHAMBERS, BOB GREGERSON, BOB WIGLEY and others
Plaintiff:
MARK CAIRNS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
