Cases 161 - 170 of 177
Schoenfeld #227495 v. Palmer
as 1:2007cv01042
Petitioner:
Daniel Henry Schoenfeld #227495
Respondent:
Carmen Palmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith #520383 v. Palmer
as 1:2007cv01018
Petitioner:
Steven Wayne Smith #520383
Respondent:
Carmen Palmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jerrils #138406 v. Palmer
as 1:2007cv00923
Petitioner:
Larry Jerrils #138406
Respondent:
Carmen Palmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McMurry #223416 v. Caruso et al
as 1:2007cv00905
Plaintiff:
John Henry McMurry #223416
Defendant:
Patricia Caruso, Anthony Stewart, Carmen Palmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spencer #534085 v. Palmer
as 1:2007cv00852
Petitioner:
Dennis Ray Spencer #534085
Respondent:
Carmen Palmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith #462967 v. Palmer
as 1:2007cv00810
Petitioner:
Brandon Lee Smith #462967
Respondent:
Carmen Palmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ferguson #203831 v. Palmer
as 1:2007cv00689
Petitioner:
Percy Lee Ferguson #203831
Respondent:
Carmen Palmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McCarty #399283 v. Palmer
as 1:2007cv00663
Petitioner:
Wayne McCarty #399283
Respondent:
Carmen Palmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis #163856 v. Palmer
as 1:2007cv00368
Petitioner:
Keith Lamar Davis #163856
Respondent:
Carmen Palmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilkins #127980 v. Palmer
as 1:2007cv00307
Petitioner:
Lucius Wilkins #127980
Respondent:
Carmen Palmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
