Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Daniel et al v. Safeco Insurance Co of America
as 2:2024cv00082
Plaintiff:
Shelby Kent Daniel and Carol Beth Daniel
Defendant:
Safeco Insurance Co of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Paul Abbott, et al v. USA
as 22-5492
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL W. ABBOTT, TONI L. ABBOTT, BRITTANY N. ADKINS and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Abbott et al v. United States of America (JRG1)
as 3:2020cv00149
Plaintiff:
Jody T. Bertram, Kelsey Y. Chambers, Larry D. Raymes and others
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Daniels et al v. Asplundh Tree Expert, LLC
as 2:2018cv00023
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Daniels and Carole N. Daniels
Defendant:
Asplundh Tree Expert, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Daniels-Stephano v. Colvin
as 1:2014cv00557
Plaintiff:
Carol Sue Daniels-Stephano
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Daniels v. Holland America Line Inc et al
as 2:2012cv00175
Plaintiff:
Carole H. Daniels
Defendant:
Holland America Line Inc , HAL Antillen NV and Holland America Line NV
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
E T C Tiger Pipeline L L C v. 80 Acres, More or Less, Located in DeSoto Parish, Louisiana et al
as 3:2010cv00580
Plaintiff:
E T C Tiger Pipeline L L C
Defendant:
80 Acres More or Less Located in DeSoto Parish Louisiana, Unknown Heirs of Emma Lou Madison, Unknown Heirs of Rosie Strother Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
In re: Jonathan Riches
as 08-1975
Appellant:
In re: JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Plaintiff:
DAWN J. HIGGINS
Defendant:
SPENCE & SPENCE, P.A., ROBERT A. SPENCE, JR., SPENCER JENKINS and others
Higgins v. Spence & Spence, P.A. et al
as 5:2007cv00033
Plaintiff:
Dawn J. Higgins
Defendant:
Spence & Spence, P.A., Robert A. Spence, Jr., Spencer Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
