Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Mitchell v. United Natural Foods, Inc. et al
as 8:2024cv00064
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Denise Mitchell
Defendant:
United Natural Foods, Inc. and Shoppers Food Warehouse Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Mitchell v. Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv22448
Plaintiff:
Carolyn A Mitchell
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Thompson-Mitchell v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00653
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Thompson-Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Soniat v. Mitchell
as 4:2017cv00572
Plaintiff:
Shelley Soniat
Defendant:
Carolyn A Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Salvador v. A Family Affair, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv01082
Defendant:
A Family Affair, Inc. , A Family Affair Bridges, Inc. , Carolyn Faye Mitchel and others
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Salvador
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
v. A Family Affair, Inc. et al
as 2:2014at00540
Defendant:
A Family Affair, Inc. , A Family Affair Bridges, Inc. , Carolyn Faye Mitchel dba A Family Affair Care and others
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Salvador
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00718
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Mitchell v. Richard Rocha et al
as 5:2010cv03424
Plaintiff:
Carolyn A Mitchell
Defendant:
Richard Rocha and State of California/Dept of Parks and Recreation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Connecticut General Life Insurance Company v. Walker et al
as 6:2009cv00466
Plaintiff:
Connecticut General Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Alwynn Walker, Jr., Yolanda Nicole Stiggons, Carolyn Yvonne Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
