Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Rodgers, Powers & Schwartz, LLP v. Minkina
as 22-1624
Appellant:
RODGERS, POWERS & SCHWARTZ, LLP
Appellee:
NATALY MINKINA
Trustee:
JOHN FITZGERALD, Assistant U.S. Trustee and CAROLYN A. BANKOWSKI
Rodgers, Powers & Schwartz, LLP v. Minkina
as 21-8027
Petitioner:
RODGERS, POWERS & SCHWARTZ, LLP
Respondent:
NATALY MINKINA
Trustee:
JOHN FITZGERALD, Assistant U.S. Trustee and CAROLYN A. BANKOWSKI
Coughlin v. Lac du Flambeau Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Ind, et al
as 20-8026
Respondent:
L.D.F. HOLDINGS, LLC, L.D.F. BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, LAC DU FLAMBEAU BAND OF LAKE SUPERIOR CHIPPEWA INDIANS and others
Trustee:
JOHN P. FITZGERALD and CAROLYN A. BANKOWSKI
Petitioner:
BRIAN W. COUGHLIN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv10304
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1334
Rodgers, Powers & Schwartz LLP v. Minkina
as 19-8022
Trustee:
JOHN FITZGERALD, Assistant U.S. Trustee and CAROLYN A. BANKOWSKI
Petitioner:
ROGERS, POWERS & SCHWARTZ, LLP
Respondent:
NATALY MINKINA
Santana v. Aura Mortgage Advisors, LLC
as 19-9005
Interested Party:
CAROLYN A. BANKOWSKI, US Trustee
Appellee:
AURA MORTGAGE ADVISORS, LLC
Appellant:
ANGEL A. SANTANA
In Re: LaMagna
as 17-1735
Petitioner:
JOHN VINCENT LAMAGNA
Respondent:
FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION
Trustee:
JOHN P. FITZGERALD and CAROLYN A. BANKOWSKI
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-1407
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-1213
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-2257
Debtor - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee - Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
