Cases 11 - 20 of 40
Doe et al v. Amherst College et al
as 2:2016mc00128
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Amherst College, Carolyn Martin, Jaes Larimore and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01174
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Doe v. Amherst College et al
as 3:2015cv30097
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Amherst College, Carolyn Martin, James Larimore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Martin v. FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv10808
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Martin
Defendant:
FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC., FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC., d/b/a FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE NORTH AMERICA, Fresenius U.S.A., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Doe v. Amherst College et al
as 3:2014cv30114
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Amherst College , Suzanne Coffey , Allen Hart and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794
Martin v. Coventry Health Care Workers Compensation Inc et al
as 4:2012cv01057
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Martin
Defendant:
Coventry Health Care Workers Compensation Inc and CNA ClaimPlus Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00627
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Carolyn Martin v. Gerald Martin, et al
as 11-56717
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CAROLYN MARTIN
Defendant:
NAVAL CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIVE SERVICE, MARK D. CLOOKIE, NCIS Director, WADE JACOBSON, NCIS Acting Special Agent in Charge and others
Defendant - Appellant:
GERALD MARTIN, "Jerry," NCIS Special Agent
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00856
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv03684
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
