Cases 1 - 10 of 17
JAMES v. TEVA BRANDED PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS R&D, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv06473
Plaintiff:
CARRIE JAMES
Defendant:
TEVA BRANDED PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS R&D, INC., TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and others
In Re:
ELMIRON (PENTOSAN POLYSULFATE SODIUM) PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
James et al v. Contra Costa County et al
as 4:2022cv05939
Plaintiff:
Carrie James and Perry Williams
Defendant:
Contra Costa County and DOES 1-50
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Daker v. Dozier et al
as 6:2022cv00072
Plaintiff:
Waseem Daker
Defendant:
Gregory Dozier, Homer Bryson, Timothy Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Waseem Daker v. Timothy Ward, et al
as 22-10632
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
TIMOTHY WARD, BRIAN OWENS, former Commissioner, HOMER BRYSON, former Commissioner and others
DAKER v. WARD
as 5:2019cv00365
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, PARALEGAL JAMIE A VALLEE, LISA FOUNTAIN and others
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daker v. Dozier et al
as 6:2018cv00073
Defendant:
Warden Jack Koon, Dr. Sharon Lewis, Lisa Fountain and others
Plaintiff:
Waseem Daker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daker v. Dozier et al
as 6:2018cv00032
Plaintiff:
Waseem Daker
Defendant:
Gregory Dozier, Timothy Ward, Jack Koon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daker v. Dozier et al
as 6:2017cv00110
Plaintiff:
Waseem Daker
Defendant:
Gregory Dozier, Timothy Ward, Jack Koon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00293
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
DAKER v. BRYSON et al
as 6:2017cv00079
Plaintiff:
Waseem Daker
Defendant:
Homer Bryson, Timothy Ward, Jack Koon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
