Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Houston v. Davenport et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2018cv00872
Defendant:
Clevon Randolph, Carter Davenport, Eddie Cook and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Houston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Myers et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2016cv00919
Plaintiff:
Melvin Smith
Defendant:
Walter Myers, Carter Davenport, Jefferson S. Dunn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harrison v. State of Alabama Department of Corrections et al(MAG2)
as 2:2016cv00686
Plaintiff:
Venture Harrison
Defendant:
State of Alabama Department of Corrections , Jefferson S. Dunn , Carter Davenport and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Dunn et al (DEATH PENALTY)
as 2:2016cv00364
Plaintiff:
David Wilson
Defendant:
Jefferson Dunn and Carter Davenport
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McNabb v. Dunn et al (DEATH PENALTY)(MEMBER)
as 2:2016cv00284
Plaintiff:
Torrey Twane McNabb
Defendant:
Jefferson Dunn and Carter Davenport
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Dunn et al (DEATH PENALTY)(MEMBER)
as 2:2016cv00269
Plaintiff:
Ronald Bert Smith
Defendant:
Jefferson Dunn and Carter Davenport
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Melson v. Dunn et al (DEATH PENALTY)(MEMBER)
as 2:2016cv00268
Plaintiff:
Robert Bryant Melson
Defendant:
Jefferson Dunn and Carter Davenport
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
West v. Dunn et al (DEATH PENALTY)(MEMBER)
as 2:2016cv00270
Plaintiff:
Geoffrey Todd West
Defendant:
Jefferson Dunn and Carter Davenport
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burton v. Dunn et al (DEATHPENALTY)(MEMBER)
as 2:2016cv00267
Plaintiff:
Charles Lee Burton
Defendant:
Jefferson Dunn and Carter Davenport
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Duncan v. Dunn et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2016cv00191
Plaintiff:
Adrian Kermit Duncan
Defendant:
Jefferson S. Dunn, Eric Bascomb, Kenneth Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
