Cases 51 - 60 of 62
Tigner v. Wheat et al
as 4:2012cv00726
Plaintiff:
Arthur Tigner
Defendant:
Wheat, Maxwell Gray, James Marsh and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shack v. Mason et al
as 4:2012cv00602
Plaintiff:
Joseph L Shack
Defendant:
John Mason, Carter Davenport and Talley
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Davenport et al
as 2:2011cv03271
Petitioner:
Tony Lee Smith
Respondent:
Carter Davenport and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bryant v. Davenport et al
as 2:2011cv02301
Petitioner:
Nicholas Bryant
Respondent:
Carter Davenport and Attorney General of State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jackson v. Culliver et al
as 4:2011cv02074
Plaintiff:
Larry Edward Jackson
Defendant:
Grantt Culliver, Derrick Hines, Davis S Wise and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nicholson v. Davenport et al
as 4:2011cv01469
Plaintiff:
Samuel Nicholson
Defendant:
Carter Davenport and Kim Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moss v. Davenport
as 4:2011cv01397
Plaintiff:
Anthony Tyrone Moss
Defendant:
Carter Davenport
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kelly v. Davenport et al
as 1:2011cv01319
Petitioner:
Terry Kelly
Respondent:
Carter Davenport and Attorney General of State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mays v. Davenport et al
as 2:2011cv01012
Petitioner:
Michael Mays
Respondent:
Carter Davenport , State of Alabama and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Scales v. Davenport et al
as 4:2011cv00231
Petitioner:
Louis Joesph Scales
Respondent:
Carter Davenport and Attorney General of State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
