Cases 11 - 20 of 62
Stokes v. Davenport et al
as 2:2015cv00734
Petitioner:
Timothy Wayne Stokes
Respondent:
Carter Davenport and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Robinson v. Davenport et al
as 4:2015cv00432
Petitioner:
Steven Robinson
Respondent:
Carter Davenport and Attorney General for the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Harrison v. St Clair Correctional Facility et al
as 4:2015cv00264
Plaintiff:
Christopher Harrison
Defendant:
St Clair Correctional Facility, Carter Davenport, Karen Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beason v. Davenport et al
as 4:2014cv01983
Petitioner:
Joseph M Beason
Respondent:
Carter Davenport and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cheatham et al v. Thomas et al
as 4:2014cv01952
Plaintiff:
Antonio Cheatham , Mark Duke , James Edwards and others
Defendant:
Kim Thomas , James Deloach , Terrance McDonnell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Davenport et al
as 4:2014cv01774
Plaintiff:
Jon Johnson
Defendant:
Carter Davenport, Robert Bentley, Kim Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grice v. Davenport et al
as 7:2014cv01772
Petitioner:
Robert Jamaine Grice
Respondent:
Carter Davenport and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pyant v. Davenport et al
as 5:2014cv01337
Petitioner:
Jacques Laviord Pyant
Respondent:
Carter Davenport and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mays v. Davenport et al
as 4:2014cv00808
Plaintiff:
Michael Mays
Defendant:
Carter Davenport, Robert Bentley, Kim Thomas and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Binyamin v. Davenport et al
as 1:2014cv00425
Petitioner:
Yusuf Binyamin
Respondent:
Carter Davenport and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
