Cases 51 - 60 of 119
Coleman v. Davenport et al (INMATE 3)

as 2:2014cv00883
Plaintiff:
Elijah Coleman
Defendant:
Carter Davenport and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pyant v. Davenport et al

as 5:2014cv01337
Petitioner:
Jacques Laviord Pyant
Respondent:
Carter Davenport and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pitts v. Davenport et al (INMATE 3)

as 3:2014cv00598
Plaintiff:
David L. Pitts
Defendant:
Carter Davenport and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mays v. Davenport et al

as 4:2014cv00808
Plaintiff:
Michael Mays
Defendant:
Carter Davenport, Robert Bentley, Kim Thomas and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Binyamin v. Davenport et al

as 1:2014cv00425
Petitioner:
Yusuf Binyamin
Respondent:
Carter Davenport and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gordy v. Davenport et al (INMATE 3)

as 3:2014cv00162
Plaintiff:
Michael Gordy
Defendant:
Carter Davenport and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gordy v. Davenport et al
as 4:2014cv00357
Petitioner:
Michael Dewayne Gordy
Respondent:
Carter Davenport and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williams v. Davenport et al

as 4:2014cv00240
Plaintiff:
Allan Williams
Defendant:
Carter Davenport, Kim Thomas, Robert Bentley and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Veteto v. Thomas et al
as 4:2014cv00190
Plaintiff:
Ronald D Veteto
Defendant:
Kim T Thomas and Carter Davenport
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stallworth v. Graham et al

as 4:2014cv00134
Plaintiff:
Freddie James Stallworth
Defendant:
Carla Graham, Chad Cleveland and Carter Davenport
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.