Cases 1 - 10 of 21
PETER et al v. WOJCICKI et al
as 2:2021cv04994
Plaintiff:
MARIA PETER, MICHAEL PETER, JULIKA BERGER and others
Defendant:
SUSAN DIANE WOJCICKI, WILLIAM HENRY CATES, STEPHANE BANCEL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CATE et al v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY
as 2:2021cv02570
Plaintiff:
ENID CATE and STEPHEN CATE
Defendant:
STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
VANLOAN v. THE NATION OF ISLAM et al
as 2:2021cv02559
Defendant:
POLICE CHIEF DAVID NISLEIT, MAIN LINE HEALTH SYSTEM, INC., RICHARD ORLOW and others
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN VANLOAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VEASEY v. UNITED STATES et al
as 2:2016cv04151
Petitioner:
FRANCIS EDWARD VEASEY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES, CAROL ROANE, MICHAEL SHAPIRO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
ACKERMAN et al v. MCKESSON CORPORATION et al
as 2:2013cv05853
Plaintiff:
PAULA ACKERMAN , RUBY ADAMS , CARL AGNELLO and others
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION and SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jackson v. Beard et al
as 3:2011cv01431
Plaintiff:
Rhonshawn Jackson
Defendant:
Jeffrey A. Beard, Shirley M. Smeal, Supt. Lawler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CATES et al v. AMERICAN MAIL LINES
as 2:2011cv37564
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN A CATES , WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant:
AMERICAN MAIL LINES
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
CATES et al v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2011cv37563
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN A CATES , WILLARD E. BARTEL and DONALD PEEBLES
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
CATES et al v. RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv64603
Plaintiff:
JERRY CATES and EDNA J CATES
Defendant:
RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lennon v. Lawler et al
as 3:2011cv00503
Plaintiff:
Aaron Jason Lennon
Defendant:
Jon D. Fisher, Corbin, B Hollinbange and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
