Cases 1 - 10 of 10
GRAHAM v. OTEY
as 1:2014cv01267
Plaintiff:
CATHERINE GRAHAM
Defendant:
MELVIN OTEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Linda Franzone et al v. Pfizer Inc et al
as 2:2014cv02377
Plaintiff:
Linda Franzone , Maria Carroll , Paula Mushol and others
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc , McKesson Corporation and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Graham v. Rockingham County Department of Corrections, Superintendent
as 1:2014cv00171
Plaintiff:
Catherine Graham
Defendant:
Rockingham County Department of Corrections, Rockingham County Department of Corrections, Superintendent and Unknown Employees
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Linda Franzone et al v. Pfizer Inc et al
as CAC/2:14-cv-01940
Plaintiff:
Linda Franzone , Maria Carroll , Paula Mushol and others
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc , McKesson Corporation and Does
Teresija Eckermann Sigmund v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2014cv02000
Respondent:
Philip Browning, County of Los Angeles, Department of Children and Family Services for the County of Los Angeles and others
Petitioner:
Teresija Eckermann Sigmund
Linda Franzone et al v. Pfizer Inc et al
as 2:2014cv01940
Plaintiff:
Deborah Adams, Louella Andrews, Barbara Bishop and others
Defendant:
Does, McKesson Corporation and Pfizer Inc
CK Franchising, Inc. v. Comfort Keepers, Inc. et al
as 1:2012mc00116
Plaintiff:
CK Franchising, Inc.
Defendant:
Comfort Keepers, Inc. and Catherine Graham
CK Franchising, Inc. v. Comfort Keepers, Inc. et al
as 1:2012mc00115
Plaintiff:
CK Franchising, Inc.
Defendant:
Comfort Keepers, Inc. and Catherine Graham
CK Franchising, Inc. v. Comfort Keepers, Inc. et al
as 1:2012mc00114
Plaintiff:
CK Franchising, Inc.
Defendant:
Comfort Keepers, Inc. and Catherine Graham
CK Franchising Inc v. Comfort Keepers Inc et al
as 3:2012cv00411
Plaintiff:
CK Franchising Inc
Defendant:
Comfort Keepers Inc and Catherine Graham
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
