Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Brooks v. Kish et al
as 8:2021cv02312
Plaintiff:
Cedric Brooks, Jr.
Defendant:
Andrew Kish, AT&T Headquarters and B. Patterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROOKS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv62527
Plaintiff:
CEDRIC BROOKS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brooks v. AT&T Headquarters et al
as 8:2021cv02323
Petitioner:
Cedric Brooks, Jr.
Defendant:
AT&T Headquarters and Manatee County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv15007
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Garrett et al v. BBVA Compass Bank et al
as 3:2019cv01491
Defendant:
Cedric Brown, BBVA Compass Bank, Charles C Guimm, III and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Runnels, Wanda Garett and Wanda Jean Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Tucker v. BBVA Compass Bank et al
as 3:2019cv01213
Defendant:
Cedric Brown, BBVA Compass Bank, Charles C Guimm, III and others
Plaintiff:
Eddie L. Tucker and Eddie L Tucker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
TUCKER v. BBVA COMPASS BANK et al
as 1:2019cv01207
Defendant:
CEDRIC BROWN, BBVA COMPASS BANK, CHARLES C. GUIMM, III and others
Plaintiff:
EDDIE L. TUCKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TUCKER v. BBVA COMPASS BANK et al
as 1:2019cv01044
Defendant:
CEDRIC BROWN, BBVA COMPASS BANK, CHARLES C. GUIMM, III and others
Plaintiff:
EDDIE L. TUCKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GARRETT v. BBVA COMPASS BANK et al
as 1:2019cv01270
Defendant:
CEDRIC BROWN, BBVA COMPASS BANK, CHARLES C. GUIMM, III and others
Plaintiff:
WANDA JEAN GARRETT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. Brooks et al
as 1:2015cv03865
Defendant:
Detective Cedric Brooks, John Does (1-5) and Police Officer Eduardo Silva
Plaintiff:
Iyona White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
