Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Garrison et al v. State of California et al
as 4:2018cv05615
Defendant:
Peace Officer Union, Judicial Commission State Bar, State of California and others
Plaintiff:
Cedric Williams and Steve Garrison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. State of California et al
as 4:2018cv05514
Defendant:
East Palo Alto Police Department, State of California, San Mateo County and others
Plaintiff:
Cedric Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. State of California et al
as 4:2018cv05449
Defendant:
Chief of Police East Palo Alto, San Mateo County, East Palo Alto Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Cedric Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Kirkpatrick
as 17-2980
Petitioner - Appellant:
Cedric Williams
Respondent - Appellee:
Michael Kirkpatrick
Williams v. USA
as 1:2016cv00111
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
Cedric Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Williams v. Kirkpatrick
as 9:2015cv01215
Petitioner:
Cedric Williams
Respondent:
Michael Kirkpatrick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thomas Patten v. NC Dept of Public Safety
as 15-1896
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS PATTEN, LESLIE TEACHEY, RYAN TURNER and others
Defendant - Appellee:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, FRANK L. PERRY, LAFAYETTE HALL and others
Patten et al v. North Carolina Department of Public Safety et al
as 5:2015ct03118
Plaintiff:
Thomas Patten , Leslie Teachey , Ryan Turner and others
Defendant:
Frank L. Perry, Lafayette Hall, Jeffrey Marks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PARKER v. SAMPSON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
as 1:2012cv00769
Plaintiff:
GARY PARKER, THOMAS PATTEN, JAMEY DOWLESS and others
Defendant:
SAMPSON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Anderson et al
as 6:2010cv03048
Plaintiff:
Cedric Williams
Defendant:
Marty Anderson and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
