Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Rowland et al v. Centex Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv12127
Defendant: Centex Corporation, Lake Forest, LLC, Eagle, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Susan Rowland, Christopher Rowland and Matthew Rowland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Zurich American Insurance Company v. Centex Corporation
as 3:2015cv01712
Plaintiff: Zurich American Insurance Company
Defendant: Centex Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type: Contract Insurance
Sylvester Maya, et al v. Centex Corporation, et al
as 12-55778
Plaintiff - Appellant: SYLVESTER MAYA, as individual and on behalf of all other similarly situated and OFER MASACHI, as individual and on behalf of all other similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee: CENTEX CORPORATION, CENTEX HOMES CORPORATION and CENTEX HOMES, A Nevada General Partnership
Pulte Homes of Texas, L.P. et al v. Chalico, Inc. a/k/a Chalico Construction et al
as 4:2010cv04982
Plaintiff: Pulte Homes of Texas, L.P. and Centex Homes
Defendant: Chalico, Inc. a/k/a Chalico Construction, Conroe Concrete, Ltd. d/b/a Yancey Ready Mix , Sprint Sand & Clay, LLC and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff: TXI Operations L P
Third_party_defendant: J. Epifanio Chalico and Jose H Chalico
Cross_claimant: TXI Operations L P , Sprint Sand & Clay, LLC , J. Epifanio Chalico and others
Cross_defendant: INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Builders Post Tension, Inc., J. Epifanio Chalico and others
Counter_claimant: TXI Operations L P , Conroe Concrete, Ltd. d/b/a Yancey Ready Mix and Chalico, Inc.
Counter_defendant: Centex Homes and Pulte Homes of Texas, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 6321
National Roofing Industry Pension Plan et al v. Acropolis Investments, Ltd. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv01882
Defendant: Accredited Surety and Casualty Company, Acropolis Investments, Ltd., American Contractors Indemnity Company and others
Nominal Defendant: John Does I-XX and ROE Entitites I-XX
Plaintiff: National Roofers & Employers Union Health & Welfare Fund and National Roofing Industry Pension Plan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Type: Labor Labor: Other
Valley Forge Insurance Company v. Crum And Forster, et al
as 2:2010cv00630
Plaintiff: Valley Forge Insurance Company , Continental Casualty Company and National Fire Insurance Company of Hartford
Defendant: Crum And Forster Specialty Insurance Company, United States Fire Insurance Company, Crum And Forster Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type: Contract Insurance
Essex v. HomeTeam Pest Defense, Inc. et al
as 5:2010cv00644
Defendant: Centex Corporation, HTPD, LLC f/k/a HomeTeam Pest Defense, LLC, HomeTeam Pest Defense, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Jamie Essex
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
James Dodaro v. Standard Pacific Corp, et al
as 10-55668
Plaintiff - Appellant: JAMES F. DODARO, as an individual and on behalf of all other similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee: STANDARD PACIFIC CORP, DBA Standard Pacific Homes and STANDARD PACIFIC MORTGAGE, INC.
Real-party-in-interest: SHEA HOMES, J.F. SHEA CO. INC., SHEA MORTGAGE, INC. and others
Sylvester Maya, et al v. Centex Corporation, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-55658
Plaintiff - Appellant: SYLVESTER MAYA, as individual and on behalf of all other similarly situated and OFER MASACHI, as individual and on behalf of all other similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee: CENTEX CORPORATION, CENTEX HOMES, a Nevada General Partnership and CTX MORTGAGE COMPANY
Sylvester Maya et al v. Centex Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2009cv01671
Plaintiff: Sylvester Maya, Sylvester Maya, Sylvester Maya and others
Defendant: Centex Corporation, Centex Homes Corporation, Centex Homes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?