Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Kathleen Sebelius, et al
as 12-5135
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Defendant - Appellee:
Kathleen Sebelius, in her official capacity as Secretary of Health and Human Services, Margaret Hamburg, M.D. - in her official capacity as Commissioner of Food and Drugs and Food & Drug Administration
Intervenor For Defendant - Appellee:
Teva Pharmaceuticals, USA, Inc. and Cephalon, Inc.
MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC. v. SEBELIUS et al
as 1:2012cv00524
Plaintiff:
MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS , MARGARET A. HAMBURG and UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION
Intervenor_defendant:
TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC. and CEPHALON, INC.
Amicu:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Movant:
PROVIGIL END-PAYORS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC. et al v. SEBELIUS et al
as 1:2012cv00512
Plaintiff:
TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC. and CEPHALON, INC.
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, MARGARET A. HAMBURG and UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
CEPHALON, INC. v. SEBELIUS et al
as 1:2011cv00542
Plaintiff:
CEPHALON, INC.
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS and MARGARET HAMBURG
Intervenor_defendant:
WATSON LABORATORIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
CEPHALON, INC. v. KAPPOS
as 1:2010cv00235
Plaintiff:
CEPHALON, INC.
Defendant:
DAVID J. KAPPOS
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
CEPHALON, INC. v. KAPPOS
as 1:2010cv00131
Plaintiff:
CEPHALON, INC.
Defendant:
DAVID J. KAPPOS
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
FRANCE v. KAPPOS
as 1:2009cv02256
Plaintiff:
CEPHALON FRANCE
Defendant:
DAVID J. KAPPOS
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION v. CEPHALON, INC.
as 1:2008cv00244
Plaintiff:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Defendant:
CEPHALON, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
