Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Mateo v. Dawn et al
as 1:2014cv02620
Plaintiff:
Cesar Mateo
Defendant:
Mason Dawn, Mary Ann Robert, Jeff McKoy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mateo v. Bristow et al
as 1:2012cv05052
Plaintiff:
Cesar Mateo
Defendant:
C. Bristow, E. Ramos, E. Maldonado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mateo v. Heath et al
as 1:2011cv00636
Plaintiff:
Cesar Mateo
Defendant:
Phillip Heath, Robinson, Robert Burton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mateo v. Alexander et al
as 1:2010cv08427
Plaintiff:
Cesar Mateo
Defendant:
Tracy Alexander and Jeffrey Erns
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mateo v. O'Connor et al
as 1:2010cv08426
Plaintiff:
Cesar Mateo
Defendant:
Kevin O'Connor, Jeffrey Macisaac, Steven Purcell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mateo v. Corebine
as 10-4363
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Cesar Mateo
Defendant:
J. Corebine, CorrecllOn Officer, John Does, CorrectIOn Officer, All members of extraction team and K. O'Connor, Correction Sergeant
Defendant - Appellee:
Scan D. Carlson, Correction OffIcer, R. Clerc, Correction Sergeant, Cell Extraction Team, all members and others
Mateo v. Superintendent Rober Ercole
as 10-4288
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Cesar Mateo
Defendant - Appellee:
Superintendent Rober Ercole, G. Williams, Correction Officer, AKA East Side Yard Williams and M. Kasper, Correction Officer
Mateo v. Bellamy et al
as 9:2010cv01254
Plaintiff:
Cesar Mateo
Defendant:
Karen Bellamy, John Doe, Daniel F. Martuscello and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mateo v. O'Connor
as 10-4014
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Cesar Mateo
Defendant - Appellee:
K. O'Connor, Correctional Sergeant, Green Haven Correctional Facility, J. MacIssac, Green Haven Correctional Facility and Palcer, Green Haven Correctional Facility
Mateo v. Gundrum et al
as 9:2010cv01103
Plaintiff:
Cesar Mateo
Defendant:
M. Gundrum, Martin and Daniel Martuscello
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
