Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv03352
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Burke v. Cardiff et al
as 4:2023cv02920
Plaintiff:
Andrew Burke
Defendant:
Durelle Cardiff, Dr. James David, Judge Chad Bridges and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burke v. Brown et al
as 4:2023cv01973
Plaintiff:
Andrew Burke
Defendant:
Judge Susan Brown, Judge Chad Bridges, Bridgette Smith-Lawson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burke v. Bridges et al
as 4:2023cv01011
Plaintiff:
Andrew Burke
Defendant:
Chad Bridges, Eric Fagan, Chief Deputy Provost and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. G.B. et al
as 2:2020cv02179
Defendant:
G. B., Sharon Bridge and Chad Bridge
Plaintiff:
David Paul Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robert Banargent v. Chad Bridges, et al
as 13-40109
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT LEE BANARGENT
Defendant - Appellee:
CHAD BRIDGES, Prosecutor, THOMAS R CULVER, III, Judge, NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN and others
Davis v. Dautrieve et al
as 2:2010cv02083
Plaintiff:
Daniel Matthew Davis
Defendant:
V J Dautrieve, W Cresap, Chad Bridges and others
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Robert Banargent v. Stephen Doggett, et al
as 10-20144
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT LEE BANARGENT
Defendant - Appellee:
STEPHEN A. DOGGETT, Attorney at Law, CARY M. FADEN, Attorney at Law, D. CRAIG HUGHES, Assistant Prosecutor and others
Banargent v. Doggett et al
as 4:2010cv00690
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Banargent
Defendant:
Stephen A Doggett, Cary M Faden, D Craig Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banargent v. Bridges et al
as 3:2010cv00055
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Banargent
Defendant:
Chad Bridges, Thomas R Culver, III, Rick Thaler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
