Cases 1 - 10 of 58
Campbell v. Priest
as 5:2024cv00002
Petitioner:
Chad Edward Campbell
Respondent:
Pazavar Priest
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dave's Floor Sanding & Installing Inc. v. Landry et al
as 0:2023cv03760
Plaintiff:
Dave's Floor Sanding & Installing Inc.
Defendant:
Chad Edward Landry, Darren Matthew Paulson and Dave's Flooring Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Dave's Floor Sanding & Installing Inc. v. Landry et al
as 0:2023cv03684
Plaintiff:
Dave's Floor Sanding & Installing Inc.
Defendant:
Chad Edward Landry, Dean Matthew Paulson and Dave's Flooring Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Johnson v. Lumpkin
as 1:2023cv00288
Petitioner:
Chad Edward Johnson
Respondent:
Director Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Lumpkin
as 3:2023cv00224
Petitioner:
Chad Edward Johnson
Respondent:
TDCJ Director Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chad WarrickIn re: Chad Warrick
as 23-5157
Petitioner:
In re: CHAD EDWARD WARRICK
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Edwards v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
as 3:2022cv00401
Plaintiff:
Chad Edwards
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Leatherman v. CoreCivic, et al
as 22-6084
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHAD EDWARD LEATHERMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
CORECIVIC, INC., MICHAEL SIZEMORE and STEPHEN PAINE, JOHN DOE, sued as: Defendants Does I - X
JOHNSON v. SOLOMON et al
as 4:2021cv00470
Plaintiff:
CHAD EDWARD JOHNSON
Defendant:
JACKIE SOLOMON and LIBERTY COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leatherman v. CoreCivic, Inc. et al
as 5:2021cv00672
Defendant:
CoreCivic Inc, John Doe, Michael Sizemore and others
Plaintiff:
Chad Edward Leatherman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
