Cases 1 - 10 of 88
Miller v. Consumers Energy
as 5:2024cv10935
Plaintiff:
Chad Miller
Defendant:
Consumers Energy
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Krantz v. CoreCivic Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00082
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Ann Krantz
Defendant:
CoreCivic Inc., Chad Miller, FNU Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Herrington v. El Paso County Sheriff Office et al
as 1:2023cv01533
Plaintiff:
Jacob Andrew Herrington
Defendant:
El Paso County Sheriff Office, Chad Miller, U.S. District Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MILLER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv10084
Plaintiff:
CHAD MILLER
Defendant:
3M and 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MILLER v. KIJAKAZI
as 2:2022cv00406
Plaintiff:
CHAD MILLER
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Stoneking v. No Named Respondent
as 1:2022cv01403
Petitioner:
Doug Stoneking
Respondent:
No Named Respondent
Defendant:
Chad Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Romayne Ratliff et al v. CoreCivic, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00256
Plaintiff:
Valerie Romayne Ratliff, Zane Miles Asher, Khaleesi Mae Asher and others
Defendant:
CoreCivic, Inc., Warden Chad Miller and Officer Heredia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Michelle Schurg, et al v. USA
as 22-35193
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHELLE SCHURG, DANIEL SCHURG, CHAD MILLER and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Bryan v. CoreCivic, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00158
Plaintiff:
Guy Bryan
Defendant:
CoreCivic, Inc., Chad Miller, Kathleen Lamphere and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
