Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Omar Shaaban v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, et al
as 22-3261
Plaintiff / Appellant:
OMAR SHAABAN
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, DIRECTOR, U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES and others
Sylvain v. Garland
as 21-2897
Petitioner / Appellant:
Colby Sylvain
Respondent / Appellee:
Merrick B. Garland, in his official capacity as Attorney General, of the United States, Alejandro Mayorkas, in his official capacity as Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Jean King, in her official capacity as director of the Executive Office Of Immigration Review and others
Shaaban v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 3:2020cv02406
Defendant:
Secretary of Homeland Security, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
Plaintiff:
Omar Shaaban
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Rodrigo Lizama Gutierrez v. Russell Hott
as 20-7448
Respondent:
MATTHEW T. ALBENCE, in his official capacity as Acting Director of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, JAMES MCHENRY, in his official capacity as Director of the Executive Office for Immigration Review, DAVID H. WETMORE, in his official capacity as Chairman of the Board of Immigration Appeals and others
Petitioner:
VICTOR QUINTANILLA GALLEGOS, RAFAEL ESCOBAR GARCIA, ENRIQUE PALOMARES REYES and others
Shaaban v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 3:2018cv01781
Defendant:
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, David L. Neal, Mark Hansen and others
Plaintiff:
Omar Shaaban
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Hector Garza-Mata v. USA, et al
as 14-41158
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HECTOR R. GARZA-MATA, Pro Se & Siblings similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THOMAS E. PEREZ, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, in his official capacity as head of the Department of Justice and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
